Phil & Ningning Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 WooHoo!!!!!It seems that CSC actually has been working on our petition. I came home this evening to find an email from them saying that NOA2 is in the mail. It was slightly quicker than I anticipated. No RFEs, maybe things will continue to progress smoothly. One can only hope. Link to comment
orygreg2 Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 Phil & Ningning, so wonderful news!! Congratulations!! Feels good to make progress. Greg Link to comment
Jeikun Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 That's awesome! conratulations. May you petition take long enough for the knot in GZ to work itself out and no longer! Link to comment
C4Racer Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 Congrats... Let's hope the rest of the process starts to speed up as well. Good luck getting thruogh Guangzhou, Michael Link to comment
oregonknl Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 Good going Phil & Ningning~! Link to comment
warpedbored Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 NOA 2 is a major milestone. Congratulations Link to comment
Guest Gene Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 Congratulations Phil and Ningning It is good to see something moving Link to comment
Trigg Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 Congratulations Phil and Ningning It is good to see something movingIt's all downhill from here. Once it is over it seems like a sort dream instead of the nightmare of today. Link to comment
cosmiclobster Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 Phil: Great news! I am also waiting for that elusive E mail.What is the date on your NO1 and the first part of the WAC #??I am WAC0409551xxxThanks! Link to comment
Phil & Ningning Posted July 10, 2004 Author Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 What is the date on your NO1 and the first part of the WAC #??I am WAC0409551xxxNOA1 was dated Jan 28 and reciept # was WAC0407953xxx Link to comment
tonado Posted July 11, 2004 Report Share Posted July 11, 2004 What is the date on your NO1 and the first part of the WAC #??I am WAC0409551xxxNOA1 was dated Jan 28 and reciept # was WAC0407953xxxWow. It took almost 6 months. Congrats. Link to comment
cosmiclobster Posted July 11, 2004 Report Share Posted July 11, 2004 Well, this is really strange. I was looking through some WAC # and I found this one, WAC 04 095 xxxxx. I know that it was filed the same day as me, Feb 20 (it is in fact an I129f that is numerically right before mine) and USCIS says they were approved on June 28.How can they approve someone who filed on Jan 28 after someone who filed on Feb 20???I dont get it !!!!! (edited to remove personally identifiable information._ Link to comment
Scott & Lai Posted July 11, 2004 Report Share Posted July 11, 2004 Phil, congratulations!!! Perhaps we'll be able to have that get-together sooner than you thought cosmiclobster, yeah, it doesn't make sense that they would approve the petitions out of order like that, but it has actually been rather common Link to comment
Bryan_Qunying Posted July 11, 2004 Report Share Posted July 11, 2004 Well, this is really strange. I was looking through some WAC # and I found this one, WAC 04 095 xxxxx. I know that it was filed the same day as me, Feb 20 (it is in fact an I129f that is numerically right before mine) and USCIS says they were approved on June 28.How can they approve someone who filed on Jan 28 after someone who filed on Feb 20???I dont get it !!!!!Could be a number of reasons! There have been couples here at CFL that have gone through at break neck speed, while others just seem to run a snails pace or slower. It is not out of the norm for this to happen. Look at my time line below and you will see one way that someone could pass you by. Hang in there! It will all come to pass! Bryan Link to comment
frank1538 Posted July 11, 2004 Report Share Posted July 11, 2004 Good news indeed. Seems like the visa process resembles one of those long balloons. You start to squeeze out the efficiencies at one end (the service centers) and the other end (GZ) starts to bulge. Good luck. As to the question about sequential processing, I was told that most service centers do process in sequence, but it's done on sort of a batch processing basis. Examiner A gets some petitions, Examiner B gets some, etc., etc. Sometimes, Examiner A get his/her batches done before Examiner B does, so the sequence is not truly linear. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now