Randy W

I think I read somewhere about getting it done at an overseas consulate

I've never heard of anyone doing that before Mr Yang, but seems like it would be available to anyone. Mr Yang would know what needs to be done.

These things can be handled quite easily - but that's a minor point behind what he's doing (or already done) - you and I can easily just disagree.

Did we read the same memo? This is about very specific scams - not about IMBRA. you read literalism.. I read metaphor... The scam process is much bigger than a single example... consider how many illegals in the country. Now consider how many legals under scams; now consider how many illegals under metaporical scams... it grows bigger.... and bigger.... and bigger... How to draw a law on that?????? Well, yes - but it is addressed to people who may be victims, and tells them what to do in the event they think they might be scammed. No US law would be applicable in any scam in a foreign country.

I think that's what he wanted to avoid - splitting up the income - for expediency. Since there are 2 people involved anyway, it would seem to make sense to have both sign it, although maybe not necessary.

Did we read the same memo? This is about very specific scams - not about IMBRA.

It sounds like the simplest thing to do would be for both to sign the same one. Otherwise, they would both have to split out their separate income. If they don't won't to do that, that's another matter.

You may wish to check out organizations such as american families united

I can't wait to hear the report. I hear the subway has an airport extension now.

Supposedly no. Take a look at:Denials Of Family-Based Immigrant Visas At Consulates And DHS Petition Revocations When NOID's that are overturned by the USCIS the VO's are required to accept the USCIS's decision and not challenge the decision. But then DOS has petty fights with USCIS all the time. In the cases I know about where an NOID has been overturned, GUZ has accepted the decision and issue a visa at the followup interview. But then GUZ has been known to forget to return NOID cases to the USCIS in a timely manner. This really gets confusing when you consider one member's wife just received her visa. They initially filed a K-1 and received an NOID, he went to China and they were married and began the process to bring his wife over, I believe they went K-3, and received their visa this week. I don't believe the NOID ever got to him, but would need to confirm this. It's an extremely strange world dealing with GUZ. It's not clear that the USCIS can over-rule that a relationship IS valid, since they have never interviewed nor received any paperwork from the beneficiary. The cases we've seen overturned seemed almost intentionally left open with specific reasons cited (such as "We don't believe they intend to get married within 90 days", or an English language teacher without a means of communication). It would seem the luck of the draw as to whether GUZ uses an over-turnable reason, or whether USCIS even bothers to do anything with it. After all that, I think that a case sent back to GUZ would most likely get a different VO, who would almost certainly see a valid relationship - and award the visa. My contention about all this is that every white-slip case should be extensively review by several VO's before being sent back. They seem to have no clue as to the impact they have on someone's life with such decisions.

Hi, I tried anything to find out the reason, I was at the Consulate outside at the time of interview, I talk to them in afternoon. They said nothing to me, just we will send it back to US for appeal. We don't like the idea of getting married and I leave her in China, an I believe in Baha'i Faith and I can not marry not leave together. I hired the attorney today, he will find out hopefully before next interview. Thanks! Except that it's going back to the US. Often, they will put the case in "lockdown" and provide no more information until it does go back. You MAY (but most likely WON'T) hear from the USCIS in the states, if they decide to hold a revocation hearing. If not, you may be able to file a "freedom of information" request to find out anything which might be in the file. The most important thing for you ( or a friend) to do, would be to watch your mailbox back in the US for any correspondence from the USCIS.

Cool, I wouldn't mind trying one of those pick ups or SUV's, the cars look very nice. Selling a car here called the "BS4" would be about as smart as GM selling the Nova (Spanish for "No go") in South America. I wonder how it's selling in England.

grammpa Roggie? Cool! Any members refering to HIS EMINENCE THE PLACEBO MOD in that way will get... :rolleyes: Yes, your hine-ass.

grammpa Roggie? Cool!

Not "approval" (NOA2) the I-129F gets sent to the service center handling the I-130 with a copy of I-130 "Receipt" notice (NOA1) http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/men...00045f3d6a1RCRD The I-485 AOS application may only be filed with an approved I-130, or with a family application (I-130) where a visa number is already available, . . . My point is that the idea of filing a second form which depends on the first IS used in other cases.

It's got to come from a DHCP server - the router should get it's IP address from your provider's DHCP server, and then it also needs to be a DHCP server for your own computers. Check the setup on the router. You should be able to access it through a browser at http:\192.168.0.1, or 192.168.0.100, or 192.168.1.0 or something like that. You may already know this - if so, give us more details - you know, the dirt. Pretty creative there with the topic, but watch it!

The I-129F (K-3) would go to Hong Kong. The I-130 (CR-1) would go to GUZ. Since you filed the I-129F, it will go to Hong Kong. The I-130 will be held in the US unless you request to have it forwarded to GUZ by filing the I-824.

they allow that in other cases, such as filing the I-130 and I-485 (otherwise, you have to wait for the I-130 approval), and, of course, the I-485 and I-131(AP) and I-785(EAD). It makes sense that it would work.

It's not too late to file your taxes. Even if you didn't make enough to have to, you can file an amended return. Fill it out, make a copy, and mail it to the IRS tomorrow - you're good to go as far as your recent tax returns.

Make that unmarried son or daughter of any age.

This is one of those things that you "can't" be denied for (the only requirement is that you both be of marriageable age), but which fits quite neatly under the "not a bonafide relationship" umbrella. So sorry for this stumbling block in your life.

Yes this on-line case status is not even a funny joke. As of today(November) Rong's I485 status is still lised as "Case received and pending" and hasn't been updated for 4 months. Hey, come on by more often.

White or blue? What did it say? She got a white paper. I hired an attorney to try to get her second interview in afew weeks which he said little chance of success, and contacted my Congressman sent him all the information. What else can I do? Thanks!

White or blue? What did it say? I'll guess white, but we shouldn't need to be guessing here.

Yes - unfortunately, her immigration status may require that her name on the SS card be the same as in the immigration database (i.e., the same name she used at the POE)