Jump to content

Non-boanfide as a Psychological Decision


HKG

Recommended Posts

Without hard facts to sustain a non-bonafide relation, would not a subjective ruling of non bonafide, as such be best left to Psychologist or Psychiatrist, who are more trained to know how the mind thinks. So quite possible the Consulates have VOs practicing medicine without a license. :whistling:

Link to comment

HKG..whatever you're smoking...either share it or stop! :unsure:

 

It is a generally accepted conclusion by our government that the VO is an all-knowing, all-seeing, wise, and logical deity, ranking right up there with Budda and Jesus Christ, but just below God status. They are infallible, unquestionable and couldn't possibly ever make a mistake. Would you demand that Jesus Christ have certification to pass on His knowledge about the after-life? Of course not! Does anyone question Budda on his knowledge and prescription for inner harmony? Of course not!...So goes the VO...

Link to comment

HKG..whatever you're smoking...either share it or stop! :P

 

It is a generally accepted conclusion by our government that the VO is an all-knowing, all-seeing, wise, and logical deity, ranking right up there with Budda and Jesus Christ, but just below God status. They are infallible, unquestionable and couldn't possibly ever make a mistake. Would you demand that Jesus Christ have certification to pass on His knowledge about the after-life? Of course not! Does anyone question Budda on his knowledge and prescription for inner harmony? Of course not!...So goes the VO...

 

Hello All, I disagree, I think they are GOD hehe. Jesus would help us Buddha will allow us to go after happiness but that is not what the VO are doing. They are making us worry, sad, and wanted to punch someone really hard walking out of an interview. I do think they consider themself GOD.

 

This is after they know for a fact that they screw up they will still not correct their mistake. Well we just all have to play the game. HKG . keep trying. That all what we can hope for.

 

JOE, - GOD FROM ANOTHER WORLD ;) . hehe

Link to comment

HKG..whatever you're smoking...either share it or stop! :lol:

 

It is a generally accepted conclusion by our government that the VO is an all-knowing, all-seeing, wise, and logical deity, ranking right up there with Budda and Jesus Christ, but just below God status. They are infallible, unquestionable and couldn't possibly ever make a mistake. Would you demand that Jesus Christ have certification to pass on His knowledge about the after-life? Of course not! Does anyone question Budda on his knowledge and prescription for inner harmony? Of course not!...So goes the VO...

 

Hello All, I disagree, I think they are GOD hehe. Jesus would help us Buddha will allow us to go after happiness but that is not what the VO are doing. They are making us worry, sad, and wanted to punch someone really hard walking out of an interview. I do think they consider themself GOD.

 

This is after they know for a fact that they screw up they will still not correct their mistake. Well we just all have to play the game. HKG . keep trying. That all what we can hope for.

 

JOE, - GOD FROM ANOTHER WORLD ;) . hehe

 

 

So maybe..just MAYBE.. the VO is the Devil Incarnate? The AntiChrist? 666=VO? LOL!

Link to comment

6. In adjudicating visa cases involving petitions, posts should bear in mind three important factors: A. the consular officer's role in the petition process is to determine if there is substantial evidence relevant to petition validity not previously considered by DHS, and not to merely readjudicate the petition; B. the memo supporting the petition return must clearly show the factual and concrete reasons for recommending revocation (observations made by the consular officer cannot be conclusive, speculative, equivocal or irrelevant) and; C. consular officers must provide to the applicant in writing as full an explanation as possible of the legal and factual basis for the visa denial and petition return. Post must maintain a copy of the returned petition, other evidence relevant to the case, and a copy of the written notification of the denial.

 

Send this to them when requesting freedom of information request (FOIA)

Link to comment

6. In adjudicating visa cases involving petitions, posts should bear in mind three important factors: A. the consular officer's role in the petition process is to determine if there is substantial evidence relevant to petition validity not previously considered by DHS, and not to merely readjudicate the petition; B. the memo supporting the petition return must clearly show the factual and concrete reasons for recommending revocation (observations made by the consular officer cannot be conclusive, speculative, equivocal or irrelevant) and; C. consular officers must provide to the applicant in writing as full an explanation as possible of the legal and factual basis for the visa denial and petition return. Post must maintain a copy of the returned petition, other evidence relevant to the case, and a copy of the written notification of the denial.

 

Send this to them when requesting freedom of information request (FOIA)

Good luck with that.

Link to comment

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...