HKG Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Without hard facts to sustain a non-bonafide relation, would not a subjective ruling of non bonafide, as such be best left to Psychologist or Psychiatrist, who are more trained to know how the mind thinks. So quite possible the Consulates have VOs practicing medicine without a license. Link to comment
Randy W Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Perhaps they could write prescriptions. I wonder if they could diagnose the petitioner ? Link to comment
HKG Posted February 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Perhaps they could write prescriptions. I wonder if they could diagnose the petitioner ? Link to comment
david_dawei Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 petitioners are incurable Just allow them to continue to play the fantasy game of the orient [ P.S. Hint: Maybe the 'orient' is metaphor for GUZ ] Link to comment
chengdu4me Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 HKG..whatever you're smoking...either share it or stop! It is a generally accepted conclusion by our government that the VO is an all-knowing, all-seeing, wise, and logical deity, ranking right up there with Budda and Jesus Christ, but just below God status. They are infallible, unquestionable and couldn't possibly ever make a mistake. Would you demand that Jesus Christ have certification to pass on His knowledge about the after-life? Of course not! Does anyone question Budda on his knowledge and prescription for inner harmony? Of course not!...So goes the VO... Link to comment
flowers Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 HKG..whatever you're smoking...either share it or stop! It is a generally accepted conclusion by our government that the VO is an all-knowing, all-seeing, wise, and logical deity, ranking right up there with Budda and Jesus Christ, but just below God status. They are infallible, unquestionable and couldn't possibly ever make a mistake. Would you demand that Jesus Christ have certification to pass on His knowledge about the after-life? Of course not! Does anyone question Budda on his knowledge and prescription for inner harmony? Of course not!...So goes the VO... Hello All, I disagree, I think they are GOD hehe. Jesus would help us Buddha will allow us to go after happiness but that is not what the VO are doing. They are making us worry, sad, and wanted to punch someone really hard walking out of an interview. I do think they consider themself GOD. This is after they know for a fact that they screw up they will still not correct their mistake. Well we just all have to play the game. HKG . keep trying. That all what we can hope for. JOE, - GOD FROM ANOTHER WORLD . hehe Link to comment
splinterman Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 HKG..whatever you're smoking...either share it or stop! It is a generally accepted conclusion by our government that the VO is an all-knowing, all-seeing, wise, and logical deity, ranking right up there with Budda and Jesus Christ, but just below God status. They are infallible, unquestionable and couldn't possibly ever make a mistake. Would you demand that Jesus Christ have certification to pass on His knowledge about the after-life? Of course not! Does anyone question Budda on his knowledge and prescription for inner harmony? Of course not!...So goes the VO... Hello All, I disagree, I think they are GOD hehe. Jesus would help us Buddha will allow us to go after happiness but that is not what the VO are doing. They are making us worry, sad, and wanted to punch someone really hard walking out of an interview. I do think they consider themself GOD. This is after they know for a fact that they screw up they will still not correct their mistake. Well we just all have to play the game. HKG . keep trying. That all what we can hope for. JOE, - GOD FROM ANOTHER WORLD . hehe So maybe..just MAYBE.. the VO is the Devil Incarnate? The AntiChrist? 666=VO? LOL! Link to comment
georgeandli Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 HKG, Make sure you add that "subjective" part from the denial notes in your rebuttal letter. That part was worth a half of a page for mine After they cite they don't do it, they say how they did it. Link to comment
HKG Posted February 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 6. In adjudicating visa cases involving petitions, posts should bear in mind three important factors: A. the consular officer's role in the petition process is to determine if there is substantial evidence relevant to petition validity not previously considered by DHS, and not to merely readjudicate the petition; B. the memo supporting the petition return must clearly show the factual and concrete reasons for recommending revocation (observations made by the consular officer cannot be conclusive, speculative, equivocal or irrelevant) and; C. consular officers must provide to the applicant in writing as full an explanation as possible of the legal and factual basis for the visa denial and petition return. Post must maintain a copy of the returned petition, other evidence relevant to the case, and a copy of the written notification of the denial. Send this to them when requesting freedom of information request (FOIA) Link to comment
LeeFisher3 Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 6. In adjudicating visa cases involving petitions, posts should bear in mind three important factors: A. the consular officer's role in the petition process is to determine if there is substantial evidence relevant to petition validity not previously considered by DHS, and not to merely readjudicate the petition; B. the memo supporting the petition return must clearly show the factual and concrete reasons for recommending revocation (observations made by the consular officer cannot be conclusive, speculative, equivocal or irrelevant) and; C. consular officers must provide to the applicant in writing as full an explanation as possible of the legal and factual basis for the visa denial and petition return. Post must maintain a copy of the returned petition, other evidence relevant to the case, and a copy of the written notification of the denial. Send this to them when requesting freedom of information request (FOIA)Good luck with that. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now