markimwaiting Posted December 28, 2002 Report Share Posted December 28, 2002 do we need to bring up the fact that we will soon have to resubmitt supporting documents like police checks, and others? Dear Mrs. Harty, We would all like to personally thank you for the outstanding job you have done so far to help clear up the backlog in the issuance of family based and fiancée visas. But, as you and many of us are aware, there is still a major problem with lost, misplaced, or just not completed name checks for many of the July and August interviewees in Guangzhou China. Consequently, we are asking for your personal intervention to institute a provisional exception to the standard process of resubmitting after the 90-day waiting period. The entire August group has already waited over 150 days for a name check clearance. A very recent response from the consulate in Guangzhou for one of the August intervieweer's seems to imply that July and August interviewees should expect at least another 90-day wait. Since current visa applicants are receiving visas the same day or next day, we should not be asked to wait another 90-days as implied in the letter quoted below. We are asking you personally, to please contact the appropriate office or offices to find these cases and have them expedited. We are also requesting a specific response to this matter including actions that will be taken to correct this inequity. Recent letter from Guangzhou: "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxcopy of letter herexxxxxxxxxxx. Regards,xxxxxxxxxxxxxxImmigrant Visa UnitU.S. Consulate General Guangzhou Please help with the following list of August interviewees Sincerlythe list Link to comment
markimwaiting Posted December 28, 2002 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2002 Also , what about a letter to Powells office asking about the name checks2 in one day? I think the name check is the hot topic up there now, and Powells office controls that.With Powell and Harty working on it , maybe something will happen.Personaly, I dont want to wait another 1-2 weeks before another letter goes out. Link to comment
AngryTexan Posted December 28, 2002 Report Share Posted December 28, 2002 Perfect. Good job!!! Link to comment
AZwolfman Posted December 28, 2002 Report Share Posted December 28, 2002 Right, good job! Just send it! It is perfect now. Let's keep it short and directed to the one subject. M. Harty is intelligent enough to realize that this is causing us pain and hardships. We have already stated, briefly, our problem and our requested solution. Too many things in one letter just makes the letter longer and harder for the reader to focus. I think the main thing is to get this letter out now. We could always write another letter later if necessary. We all appreciate your dedication, Mark.Keith Link to comment
markimwaiting Posted December 28, 2002 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2002 Right, good job! Just send it! It is perfect now. Let's keep it short and directed to the one subject. M. Harty is intelligent enough to realize that this is causing us pain and hardships. We have already stated, briefly, our problem and our requested solution. Too many things in one letter just makes the letter longer and harder for the reader to focus. I think the main thing is to get this letter out now. We could always write another letter later if necessary. We all appreciate your dedication, Mark.KeithOk, then its done, this is it.I will put this all together with the GZ letter for all to view. Link to comment
skibum Posted December 28, 2002 Report Share Posted December 28, 2002 intervieweer's ?? What is the "entire August group"? Some August interviewees have received visas. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now