Jump to content

China (and others) on North Korea


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Sure has we have a new bus driver now (Ole Randy) and a totally new clientele than the old days. You keep coming around to see us old alligators ya hear. Some of us still here. You still in the music buiness? How about your health is it still holding up? You sound like it has.

 

Holler at us now and again.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

from the Global Times on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/globaltimesnews/videos/357376414952522/

 

#NorthKorea is unlikely to abandon nuclear weapons in 10 yrs. The key to the future is to set up a more stable and peaceful regional order in the context of North Korea’s possession of nuclear weapons: Yan Xuetong, a leading Chinese expert on foreign policy

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.facebook.com/globaltimesnews/videos/357376414952522/

Link to comment

. . . and an article (and a very good analysis) from the GT)

 

Will Kim-Trump DMZ meet set doves cooing?

c6ac2553-fa80-4d8e-8dcb-3d20851776a3.jpe

 

Quote
Most importantly, the Trump administration has realized that resolution of the nuclear issue needs a drawn-out process of multilateral cooperation. Not only did Trump's plan of complete, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization (CVID) fail to pass Pyongyang's muster, it also lacked rationality. Since the second half of 2018, Washington has renamed CVID as FFVD (final, fully verifiable denuclearization). Trump has had to focus on long-term containment rather than short-term solutions.
 
Reality demands that US policy on North Korea be flexible. In the near future, the maximum pressure technique might have to give way to strategic forbearance. Trump intended to break the impasse in denuclearization negotiations on the peninsula during his trip to the DMZ by sending a strong signal to adopt political solutions. The Trump administration is also likely to move closer to Beijing and Moscow in terms of the solution framework.
 
Will this DMZ meeting lead to an official Kim-Trump summit in Washington? First, it depends on the progress of negotiations. From the US perspective, the possibility to lift economic sanctions on North Korea hinges on Pyongyang's steps in the future. Second, the US sense of urgency to resolve the nuclear issue needs to be factored in. In the long run, the current impasse is to North Korea's disadvantage.
 
If Kim goes to the US, he must realize that he is dealing with a powerful adversary. However, the third Kim-Trump summit will not materialize until a new and greater political compromise is struck.
 
The author is professor and director of the School of International Politics, Institute of Politics and Public Management, Yanbian University. opinion@globaltimes.com.cn

 

Edited by Randy W (see edit history)
Link to comment

It is not going to happen overnight as Trump thought at the beginning it will take a long time in my opinion. If it ever fully materializes but the rockets, for the time being, have at least stopped.

Yeah all they are doing is sinking their short range missiles into the sea. This is progress!

Link to comment
  • Randy W changed the title to China (and others) on North Korea

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...