Robert S. Posted December 16, 2002 Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 I have talked to JUZ on the phone and it seems when he talked to the info line last Thursday he was told there were actually "very few" clearances sent for Chinese people. I told him this was probably wrong, that the info line people don't know anything, but I would check into it some more. If someone remembers where the 5000 number originally came from will you please help by finding it and posting where I can look at it? Despite this further confusion the letter will continue to go forward and is nearly finished. I am going to add a line to the effect that we don't have any *official* word about what is actually going on and this is very distressing to us. Link to comment
markimwaiting Posted December 16, 2002 Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 I have talked to JUZ on the phone and it seems when he talked to the info line last Thursday he was told there were actually "very few" clearances sent for Chinese people. I told him this was probably wrong, that the info line people don't know anything, but I would check into it some more. If someone remembers where the 5000 number originally came from will you please help by finding it and posting where I can look at it? Despite this further confusion the letter will continue to go forward and is nearly finished. I am going to add a line to the effect that we don't have any *official* word about what is actually going on and this is very distressing to us.It was me RobertThis is what Andrew Simpkin told me about 2 weeks ago.It was also confirmed by a few people.I wonder if they lied to us to keep us poor dirt dwellers happy? Link to comment
Guest enight Posted December 16, 2002 Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 hi Robert, the 5000 name clearance first came out from Mark ( thanks Mark:)) then some of the others who have talked to DOS also confirmed this information... one guy said he was told the number was 5100. so I do think it's not a rumor good luck to all of us! Link to comment
Guest enight Posted December 16, 2002 Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 addition... if you go look in the very previously posts here, you would able to find all those sayings there Link to comment
markimwaiting Posted December 16, 2002 Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 I have talked to JUZ on the phone and it seems when he talked to the info line last Thursday he was told there were actually "very few" clearances sent for Chinese people. I told him this was probably wrong, that the info line people don't know anything, but I would check into it some more. If someone remembers where the 5000 number originally came from will you please help by finding it and posting where I can look at it? Despite this further confusion the letter will continue to go forward and is nearly finished. I am going to add a line to the effect that we don't have any *official* word about what is actually going on and this is very distressing to us.It was me RobertThis is what Andrew Simpkin told me about 2 weeks ago.It was also confirmed by a few people.I wonder if they lied to us to keep us poor dirt dwellers happy?Mark, There you go again! They probably told you 5.000 and you got the decimal point in the wrong place. >Jimacually it .0005 and thye dont know where the rest of a whole is. Link to comment
PJ Posted December 16, 2002 Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 All, At the risk of getting flamed for abusing the "pinning" system, I have brought to the forefront the threads where people first reported news concerning the 5,000 security clearances being sent to Guangzhou. I feel that it is important that we track down the validity of this information, since it seems to currently be in question. Could someone please help try to verify this information? Thanks, P.J. Link to comment
Robert S. Posted December 16, 2002 Author Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 Sorry to make so much trouble but I had to have it. Just now I got off the phone talking the Mr Simpkin, who had first issued the 5000 number to Mark. He again re-confirmed this amount for me. Link to comment
PJ Posted December 16, 2002 Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 All, Based on the information I received from Robert and Jim (thanks, gentlemen!), Robert has received confirmation that the number is correct. I have unpinned the threads I dug up from early this month and let them sink back to their appropriate places in the history of this forum. Thanks, P.J. Link to comment
PJ Posted December 16, 2002 Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 Robert, Just received your email. THANK YOU SO MUCH for confirming this information for us! Okay, so Guangzhou has the 5,000 or so security clearances, now they just need to distribute the visas! P.J. Link to comment
juz Posted December 16, 2002 Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 Guys, I am sorry to start this paranoia. No news makes me a dumb boy. Link to comment
Robert S. Posted December 16, 2002 Author Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 NOT your fault!!!!! Link to comment
Guest bbridges51 Posted December 17, 2002 Report Share Posted December 17, 2002 And just to really depress your day, rumor is that 5000 is what cleared and is currently being processed in GZ, but that at least another 5K are backlogged. Oh, sometimes the glass is half empty. Brian Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now