longstrangetrip Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 My SO's hometown(and hukou) is in a city in Guangxi, but she was studying in Beijing at university. when the G325A asks for Applicant's Residence for the last 5 years. Question: do I put down just her legal (hukou) residence in Guangxi, or do I include the Beijing address at school? USCIS site is not very user friendly for such questions...surprise surprise.... Link to comment
Guest ShaQuaNew Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 The USCIS wan't a chronological history of residence for the past five years for both the petitioner and the beneficiary. Use attachments if necessary, but list addresses using a... From: 12/11/2003 to Present From: 9/12/1999 to 12/11/2003 type of format Link to comment
HanLi Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 you need to list all addresses where she has resided for longer than 6 months since her 16th birthday......... Link to comment
Guest ShaQuaNew Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 see... http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?pg=k3guide Hank, I don't believe that's true. The USCIS wants to know everywhere the person depicted in the G325a has lived for the past five years. ALL, every place, each one, the whole ball-of-wax.... The police history on the other hand deals with residence of 6 months and more... Link to comment
mercator Posted December 7, 2005 Report Share Posted December 7, 2005 325a is every address only the last 5 years. If she lived there a month, put it down. Use extra sheets if you can't write those really long Chinese addresses (my wifes GZ addy is like a paragraph long) in that microscopic box. Legibility is worth more than box-fitting, imho Link to comment
ameriken Posted December 7, 2005 Report Share Posted December 7, 2005 Safer to put both addresses than to omit one. And, as mercator said, she will need police records for both places if she lived at either for 6 months or more Link to comment
Joanne Posted December 7, 2005 Report Share Posted December 7, 2005 (edited) Safer to put both addresses than to omit one. And, as mercator said, she will need police records for both places if she lived at either for 6 months or more174032[/snapback]Yes, all addresses resided in past 5 years should be listed. However, she only need one police certificate from China to cover all. The certificate will be issued by the police station where her Hukou is. Then get this certificate notarized. Edited December 7, 2005 by Joanne (see edit history) Link to comment
david_dawei Posted December 7, 2005 Report Share Posted December 7, 2005 my opinion would be to let it go... but have it documented and ready to hand over if ever requested for it... Link to comment
david_dawei Posted December 7, 2005 Report Share Posted December 7, 2005 see... http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?pg=k3guide Hank, I don't believe that's true. The USCIS wants to know everywhere the person depicted in the G325a has lived for the past five years. ALL, every place, each one, the whole ball-of-wax.... The police history on the other hand deals with residence of 6 months and more...173894[/snapback]One other place other than police history... The DS-230 (part I) will ask for places of residency since age 16, of six months or more... Link to comment
HanLi Posted December 7, 2005 Report Share Posted December 7, 2005 see... http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?pg=k3guide Hank, I don't believe that's true. The USCIS wants to know everywhere the person depicted in the G325a has lived for the past five years. ALL, every place, each one, the whole ball-of-wax.... The police history on the other hand deals with residence of 6 months and more...173894[/snapback]One other place other than police history... The DS-230 (part I) will ask for places of residency since age 16, of six months or more...174096[/snapback]David,thanks for the clarification, it was my intent to mention that, but that is what makes this forum so great, always more information from the collaborative effort.... Link to comment
Guest ShaQuaNew Posted December 7, 2005 Report Share Posted December 7, 2005 thanks for the clarification, it was my intent to mention that, but that is what makes this forum so great, always more information from the collaborative effort....174098[/snapback]You're welcome.... Link to comment
longstrangetrip Posted December 7, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2005 thanks for the clarification, it was my intent to mention that, but that is what makes this forum so great, always more information from the collaborative effort....174098[/snapback]I second, third, fourth (and drink my fifith to) that sentiment. If i had not found this site I would be paying a lawyer who would probably know much less than the collective wisdom given at this site about the specific deal with K1 from GUZ, and he would be taking more time....thank you all. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now