Socialist Legal System

[Guest Tony n Terrific]

这就不是经济发展的过程吗？中国的制造业像大米一样吸引我们西方老鼠，然后我们吃饱肚子才发现本地的猫也长大还有变俄。。。

中国引进了资本主义的市场化但没有相应的法制，所以变成大欺小，强欺弱，官商勾结，民营企业纷纷倒闭。中国即将变成菲律宾！它的女人要去别的国家做保姆！

泰国，它的男人想做女人，它的女人想做鸡！

 

家乐福在深圳欠一个大米供应商38万人民币，它扣清洁费等等费用，变成供应商要欠家乐福8000人民币！人家财大气粗，你怎么告它？你只有跳楼去！

家乐福敢不敢在美国做这种事？它只要连续欠3个供应商5000美元，供应商就可以到法院宣告它破产， 变卖它的资产还钱。

 

This is not the economical development process? China's manufacturing industry rice equally attracts our West mouse likely, then we eat to the full the belly only then to discover the local cat also grows up also has changes Russia.。。

 

 

 

But China introduced the capitalism marketability not to have the corresponding legal system, therefore turned bullies greatly slightly, bullied weakly, the bureaucratic business-people colluded with, the private enterprise went out of business in abundance.China soon turns the Philippines! Its woman must go to other country to be the nursemaid!

Thailand, its man wants to be the woman, its woman wants to make the chicken!

Family Le Fu owes rice supplier 380,000 Renminbi in Shenzhen, it buckles clean expense and so on expenses, turns the supplier to have to owe the family the happy lucky 8000 Renminbi! Others filthy rich, how do you consider it? You then jump from an upper story!

Family Le does Fu dare in US to make this kind of matter? So long as it owes 3 supplier 5000 US dollars continuously, the supplier may arrive the court to announce it goes bankrupt, sells off its property to return the money.

[SmilingAsia]

Tony, your translation is very cute.

It's nationalism, prejudice, not political correct. That's why I feel more comfortable to use my native language.

 

不要责怪西方帝国主义掠夺你 （中国人有受害者情结，动不动就说 “帝国主义很狡猾”），是中国地方政府官员的贪婪和愚昧！

兰州的自来水供水系统，评估是值9个亿人民币，法国人花了17个亿人民币把它买下了。

简直不敢相信！只有在好莱坞的电影里面才有：坏蛋把一个沙漠地区的供水系统控制了。

法国人最会把水做成奢侈品：依云矿泉水，450毫升的，在超市是8元人民币，在大酒店是45元人民币。

等自来水变成“依云矿泉水”的时候，兰州的百姓怎么生活？

帝国主义不狡猾，是我们中国人笨！好莱坞的电影就告诉我们：想控制沙漠供水系统的那个是坏蛋！

 

我们这里有一位同仁，他告诉我：他的太太38岁了，所以在中国找不到工作。

另外一位同仁，我问他的未婚妻为什么换那么多地址，这对签证不利，她说她经常找不到工作，她20几岁，大学毕业。

 

在美国，做鸡，通常是染上毒瘾，要赚钱吸毒。

在中国，做鸡，是因为要寄钱回乡下养父母和弟弟妹妹。

在广东的中山，色情行业受到地方政府保护，当地官员和美籍华人一起开着奔驰去叫鸡！

这就是中国的资本主义加腐败的封建主义！

 

国人的列祖列宗应该从坟墓里爬出来哭泣！

Edited March 11, 2010 by SmilingAsia (see edit history)

[weiaijiayou]

These are really good points. There doesn't seem to be much legal recourse for the little guy in China when companies are colluding with government.

 

The thing with Jialefu sounds despicable. If it's true, then I'm sad to say I've shopped there quite a bit when in China. In America we used to have companies do some crazy things to their workers -- for example, letting them work all day in close contact with materials that the company knew would eventually kill them. In many cases they got sued, and work conditions improved (let alone actually paying workers for what they produced or did).

[weiaijiayou]

ÔÚÖйú£¬×ö¼¦£¬ÊÇÒòΪҪ¼ÄÇ®»ØÏçÏÂÑø¸¸Ä¸ºÍµÜµÜÃÃÃá£

Really? Chinese prostitutes mostly are making money to send home, not for drugs?

 

ÎÒ²»ÊÇ»³ÒÉÄ㣬ֻÊǾõµÃºÜ³Ô¾ª¡£¡£¡£ÄÇËýÃǵĸ¸Ä¸µÜµÜÃÃÃÃÖªµÀËýÃÇÔÚ³ÇÊÐÔÚ×öʲô¹¤×÷Âð£¿

[SmilingAsia]

在中国，做鸡，是因为要寄钱回乡下养父母和弟弟妹妹。

Really? Chinese prostitutes mostly are making money to send home, not for drugs?

我不是怀疑你，只是觉得很吃惊。。。那她们的父母弟弟妹妹知道她们在城市在做什么工作吗？

It's a tough job to be a prostitute so some ended up with drugs and that's where a human life ends. 走上了不归路。

Boys are favored in China. In the country, a couple would keep on bringing babies to the world till they have a son. Their family is extremely poor due to penalty of birth control violation. So the girls have to make a living and help raising family after she is 16 years old.

天哪，我还真的不想出卖朋友。我们这里有一位同仁，他说他的女朋友做过鸡，因为她是单身妈妈，要养两个孩子！

 

Long time ago, I used to post an email written by a Chinese American. He said he can enjoy a prostitue for free as he is introducing clients to this prostitute! Rich guys and local officials are advantage of a 19-year-old prostitute! What animals they are!

Edited March 11, 2010 by SmilingAsia (see edit history)

[weiaijiayou]

¿Éϧ it's a shame...

[GDBILL]

Unless you are a prostitute or have done extensive research into why they do what they've chosen to do, how can you claim to know?

 

Kind of moronic to lay a blanket over an entire class of people just because you have a "friend."

[Guest Tony n Terrific]

Hi Eunice. I wanted to show you I learned the translation link you sent to me a few years back.

We miss seeing you on Candle with your un-politically correct statements. You are a no BS person. You are the real McChinese. Don't ever change.

 

Tony

[knloregon]

I'm in agreement with much about both the injustices to be addressed by a new rule-of-law in China, and the impediments to its being implemented. the corruption will not disappear soon, so the system will continue to be suspect in the eyes of the populace---- relegating them to the streets in protest---the current system.

 

As GDB pointed out, the central government has only so much control over the provinces, and since there is currently little tax structure to support provincial government programs, graft traditionally fills that void.

 

regarding the Szechwan quake--- I hear a different story from a person I know who has spent considerable time in the region. After the 1976 Tainjian quake, China's civil engineers crafted standard plans for many public buildings, including schools. These standards were nationally applied, and, apparently, most of the schools in the quake affected area were built to these plans/standards. Yes, there could have been deficiencies in the quality of building materials, but it would take a forensic engineering investigation (similar to the one that took place after the Minneapolis bridge collapse of three years ago) to establish these deficiencies.

 

That doesn't happen anywhere in the world after earthquakes, (including the US) which are chalked up to: "Acts of God" the fact that schools fell next to buildings that were still standing is part of the mysterious and selective nature of earthquakes----it was particularly pronounced in the Haiti quake ---nearly 100% damage for several blocks, standing next to blocks of almost no damage.

 

So what's the point of Chinese dissidents stirring up families grieving for their dead children? Even under our well developed Civil Court system, if the 'wrongful death' suits had gone to trial, they almost certainly would lose under the 'act of God' principle applied to natural disasters. Tragically, nothing will bring these children back, and after the quake, I certainly held mine that much more closely.

 

So what is the motive in the Western film making that seeks to portray China as the villain of this natural event? I haven't seen it, but am unsurprised that it was nominated for an Academy award.

 

Yes, there are graphic differences between the western (liberal) American system, and the very Chinese authoritarian system, and one of those pronounced differences is that China after a disaster of this magnitude will tend to the whole-----not the individual.

 

Now, years later, many of the victims of Katrina continue to languish in trailers: the quake affected communities of Szechwan have been rebuilt, better than the original.

[Guest jin979]

China will create its own system, will work for China, we have no need to even think a western system is better "ideal", I always find it funny that here think we what to have what you have and that we even believe your system is good, arrogence of the west.

[Christopher]

Human nature is the same everywhere. No country or race have special virtues--if they are doing better, it's pretty much because of good luck.

 

So the problems faced by Chinese people in their relationship with their government are the same problems Western people face in their relationship with their government.

 

The only arrogance we can offer, is to pretend that our solutions to our problems can't be improved upon.

[warpedbored]

China will create its own system, will work for China, we have no need to even think a western system is better "ideal", I always find it funny that here think we what to have what you have and that we even believe your system is good, arrogence of the west.

During the great leap forward and the cultural revolution China's economic performance was dismal. Many people were hungry and life in China was not easy. It wasn't until 1978 under Deng Xiao Ping that the lives of everyday people started to improve. This was when China adopted a more western style market economy and invited foreign investment. My wife grew up during the great leap forward and the cultural revolution. She calls it "the 10 years China was crazy".

[Guest Pommey]

China will create its own system, will work for China, we have no need to even think a western system is better "ideal", I always find it funny that here think we what to have what you have and that we even believe your system is good, arrogence of the west.

During the great leap forward and the cultural revolution China's economic performance was dismal. Many people were hungry and life in China was not easy. It wasn't until 1978 under Deng Xiao Ping that the lives of everyday people started to improve. This was when China adopted a more western style market economy and invited foreign investment. My wife grew up during the great leap forward and the cultural revolution. She calls it "the 10 years China was crazy".

 

 

 

I dont think the west invented "market economy" china was trading with many countries thousands of years ago.

[david_dawei]

China will create its own system, will work for China, we have no need to even think a western system is better "ideal", I always find it funny that here think we what to have what you have and that we even believe your system is good, arrogence of the west.

During the great leap forward and the cultural revolution China's economic performance was dismal. Many people were hungry and life in China was not easy. It wasn't until 1978 under Deng Xiao Ping that the lives of everyday people started to improve. This was when China adopted a more western style market economy and invited foreign investment. My wife grew up during the great leap forward and the cultural revolution. She calls it "the 10 years China was crazy".

I dont think the west invented "market economy" china was trading with many countries thousands of years ago.

I kind of didn't want to say anything... but now the cat's out of the bag... we are a little too much into labels; but since china has discovered most of anything thousands of years ago, we still want to assign western "discoveries". It's a western conceit and arrogance. Long live the west.