Guest ShaQuaNew Posted June 6, 2006 Report Share Posted June 6, 2006 Favor's case might be signaling a change in the consulate's approach to third party correspondence. Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but I recall that most TPC cases have resulted in a return of the files to USCIS with a recommendation to revoke and without much opportunity to rebut the allegations. In this instance, it sounds like Favor is being given the opportunity to provide additional information while the files are still at the consulate - to me a better way to address the issue.221958[/snapback] I am under the impression that the only ones sent back to the US were the ones with actual evidence in them which could be corroborated with the applicant. I think there have been other cases that were simply blue-slipped, but I can't think of whose.221968[/snapback]I agree. This sort of judgement is left to the discretion of the VO as to whether it can be resolved with additional easy-to-get evidence, or whether it needs to be bumped up to the "hold-in-abeyance" black hole. Link to comment
LeeFisher3 Posted June 6, 2006 Report Share Posted June 6, 2006 Favor's case might be signaling a change in the consulate's approach to third party correspondence.0„2 Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but I recall that most TPC cases have resulted in a return of the files to USCIS with a recommendation to revoke and without much opportunity to rebut the allegations.0„2 In this instance, it sounds like Favor is being given the opportunity to provide additional information while the files are still at the consulate - to me a better way to address the issue.221958[/snapback] I am under the impression that the only ones sent back to the US were the ones with actual evidence in them which could be corroborated with the applicant. I think there have been other cases that were simply blue-slipped, but I can't think of whose.221968[/snapback]We've seen both ways and if it stays in China to be resolved is the best. I think we have one member who is still fighting the Notice of Intent to Deny based on TPC. Link to comment
Randy W Posted June 6, 2006 Report Share Posted June 6, 2006 Christer is a case where it was sent back to the US late last year and is still fighting. One of his (relatively) recent threads and a more recent update Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now